Chicago
Track Your Order
0
5 things I wish monitor arms did better
If you spend a significant amount of time at your desk, you've probably consider replacing your display's default stand with a monitor arm. It conveniently clamps to your desk and holds your monitor aloft, freeing up table real estate and unlocking a range of motion so you can position your screen exactly where you want it. These arms can hold up to one, two, or three monitors together, promising better ergonomics while also increasing the cool factor, as the display appears to levitate.
While our favorite monitor arms are serviceable and built to last, the product design leaves me yearning for optimization. Since I integrated one into my setup and discussed my qualms with other arm users, I've come to understand there are a handful of model-agnostic concerns that bother everyone. On the bright side, they all seem easily fixable at the manufacturer's end. Here are five areas where I desperately wish monitor arm makers would step up their game.
More colors please
Why stick with grayscale for everything
Colors are the least likely to grind one's gears when shopping for a monitor arm. While the product will mostly remain tucked out of sight behind your display, the range of color options available currently is depressingly monotonous. It's a sea of black, silver/gray, and the occasional white at retail outlets and in online stores. While these are safe bets that blend into office environments, they also lack personality, which you're likely looking to add with every upgrade.
I've gone to great lengths to color-coordinate my keycaps, cables, mouse pads, and speakers, but the monitor arm is usually exempt from this personalization. We once believed that PC cases could only be either black, white, or large glass boxes with RGB lights, but several case makers have managed to integrate bright colors and even wooden accents neatly. It's a stretch to believe monitor arms cannot go down the same road.
Imagine wanting a warm, walnut-themed desk setup, perhaps with brass accents. A standard black or silver arm sticks out like a sore thumb, while PC cases and custom water-cooling hardware will help you achieve the desired look. Unfortunately, unlike PC cabinets, these display stands cannot be disassembled or spray-painted in your backyard, especially not the more pricey gas spring models, which pack a preloaded spring inside.
Even offering a few more standard colors beyond the grayscale trio, or perhaps collaborations for limited-edition runs like we see with keyboards and mice, would be a significant improvement over the current stagnation.
Dependable cable management solutions
It's hard enough to account for motion as it is
Managing every wire that falls off the edge of your desk is the perennial bane of many a desk setup enthusiast. Monitor arms promise a solution here, often featuring integrated channels or clips meant to guide power and display cables discreetly down the arm and away from the connected display. Unfortunately, most budget and even mid-range arms offer flimsy plastic clips that barely hold two thick cables, or shallow channels with covers that pop off if you breathe on them funny.
Compared to the clean routing possible with cable sleeves, chains, raceways, or even just careful use of zip ties and magnets behind a traditional monitor stand, the integrated solutions on many arms feel like an afterthought. You end up with cables that don't fit, covers breaking off, and clips sagging over time. Out of sheer desperation, I'm resorting to strapping the cables to the outside of the arm, effectively defeating the purpose of the integrated system. It looks messy and undermines the clean aesthetic that the arm is supposed to facilitate.
What we need are deeper, wider channels capable of accommodating multiple cables, including thicker DisplayPort or HDMI headers to pass through. Secure, robust channel covers that click firmly into place or flexible systems like reusable Velcro straps integrated into the arm's design could work well. Some premium arms get this right, but it shouldn't be a luxury. Good cable management is fundamental to the appeal of a monitor arm, and most products on the market just don't cut it.
Better tilt support
Especially downward
Most monitor arms offer a decent range of swivel (side-to-side), rotation, and height adjustment. Where they stumble is tilt — the ability to angle the screen up or down. You get some upward tilt, which is fine, but the downward tilt is frequently limited, sometimes to as little as 15 or 20 degrees, depending on the screen size and the arm's dimensions. This might seem sufficient, but several common use cases cry out for more.
Limited downward tilt forces you into awkward neck positions or compromises your posture when your display is above eye level. This might not be a big challenge for single-display setups, but if you have two displays stacked or one oriented vertically, tilting downwards significantly reduces distracting reflections from ambient light. If you use a monitor as a reference screen above your main display for color correction or digital art with a drawing tablet, more downward tilt support can be incredibly beneficial.
Many basic monitor stands offer virtually no downward tilt, so arms are already an upgrade. However, budget arms often skimp on the quality and range of the tilting mechanism. Manufacturers often assume a standard, seated user's posture and fail to adequately account for the dynamic adjustments required in flexible workspaces. Providing a tilt range that accommodates, say, -40° to +60° would cover a vastly wider range of ergonomic needs without significantly complicating the arm's design.
List arms by weight, not screen size
One's a reference and one's a metric
Arguably, the most frustrating aspect of monitor arms starts to bother most users even before they select a product to buy. Most online marketplaces advertise a maximum screen size they can support, such as "up to 32 inches". This is a fundamentally flawed metric, reinforced by years of simplistic consumers looking up monitor arms by screen size, and online sellers optimizing for the same keywords.
Monitors of the same size can have vastly different weights. An older, chunkier 27-inch panel might outweigh a sleek, modern 32-inch ultrawide. Furthermore, the depth of the VESA mount on the back of the monitor affects leverage and stability, which screen size alone does not account for. And I'm not even mentioning the bending moment curved displays introduce, which means that a mount rated for a 13lb flat display may droop down with a similar 13lb curved screen.
The truly critical specification is the weight capacity of the arm. It might technically accommodate a 34-inch ultrawide based on VESA compatibility, but if the monitor's weight exceeds the arm's limit, you'll face constant drooping, instability, or a catastrophic failure. Conversely, a heavy-duty arm might be perfectly capable of supporting an older, heavier 24-inch monitor, even if its listed minimum display size is smaller. Basing compatibility primarily on screen size is misleading and potentially dangerous. Support for multiple displays per arm only complicates matters further.
Manufacturers list weight capacity, but it is often buried in the specifications, while the screen size is prominently displayed. This needs to flip. Weight capacity should be the qualifying metric, with screen size serving as a secondary guideline, much like mounts for TVs, where weight is paramount. Sure, looking up the weight of your display that's sold by size as a primary metric is an additional step, but all manufacturers list the spec. This singular change could lead to safer, more informed purchasing decisions.
Versatility in mounting options
Three–in-one should be possible
Many desks, especially affordable ones or sit/stand frames, have a metal substructure running directly underneath the edge of the tabletop. Standard monitor arm clamps are designed to grip the tabletop's thickness itself, usually requiring an inch or two of unobstructed depth underneath. Most clamps don't fit framed desks like mine.
The typical C-clamp included with most monitor arms becomes useless. You tighten the screw, and it just hits the metal frame instead of pressing securely against the underside of the desktop. Your only options are to drill a hole for a grommet mount, which isn't always feasible or desirable, or buy a specialized clamp separately, if you can even find one that works.
Manufacturers could easily address this by offering clamps with a deeper "throat" — allowing the screw mechanism to reach further under the desk, past the frame. Alternatively, including a grommet mount option by default in the box, along with other options like a wall mount plate, would give buyers more options if the supplied clamp doesn't cut it. It's a simple design consideration that would save a lot of headaches for people whose desks don't have that perfectly clear edge the standard clamps assume.
The finishing touch for a perfect setup
Despite their limitations, monitor arms are already a fantastic quality-of-life upgrade, offering ergonomic flexibility and cleaner aesthetics that far surpass stock stands. But they hover on the edge of being truly indispensable. By addressing these key concerns that impact all but the most elite offerings money can buy, manufacturers could elevate them from a nice-to-have to an essential component of any comfortable desk setup.
